000			01199nam a22002177a 4500
005			20241204140818.0
008			241204b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780691243269
040			_cAL
041			_aeng
082			_223 _a340.1 _bSCAM
100			_aAntonin Scalia _9187618
245			_aMatter of Interpretation
260			_aNew Jersey _bPrinceton University Press _c2022
300			_axxiv,173p. _bPB _c21x14cm.
520			_aLike Socrates long ago, Antonin Scalia loved to argue. As with the best Socratic dialogues of old, the book you now hold in your hand overflows with opinion—not just assertions of its provocative protagonist, but also contentions arrayed against the provocateur’s position. To his great credit, Justice Scalia invited pushback to the views he laid out in the main text of this book. Several towering scholars of his era—Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin—rose to the challenge with sparkling responses that did not merely say, “Amen.” Repeatedly, these response essays also...
650			_aLaw _9187611
650			_aCommon Law Courts _9187612
700			_aSCALIA (Antonin) _9187613
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c232059 _d232059