01112nam a22001937a 450000500170000000800410001702000180005804000070007604100080008308200200009110000190011124500290013026000490015930000290020852006300023765000080086765000220087570000210089720241204140818.0241204b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  a9780691243269  cAL  aeng  223a340.1bSCAM  aAntonin Scalia  aMatter of Interpretation  aNew JerseybPrinceton University Pressc2022  axxiv,173p.bPBc21x14cm.  aLike Socrates long ago, Antonin Scalia loved to argue. As with the best Socratic dialogues of old, the book you now hold in your hand overflows with opinion—not just assertions of its provocative protagonist, but also contentions arrayed against the provocateur’s position. To his great credit, Justice Scalia invited pushback to the views he laid out in the main text of this book. Several towering scholars of his era—Gordon S. Wood, Laurence H. Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin—rose to the challenge with sparkling responses that did not merely say, “Amen.” Repeatedly, these response essays also...  aLaw  aCommon Law Courts  aSCALIA (Antonin)